Sorry for little pause in updates. My personal circumstances are changing including a potential move, though I should still be in the 26th district. But on to the topic at hand…
Limited government conservative and establishment Republicans have long butted heads and 2010 is no exception. For starters, you can look south to Florida for The Rubio/Crist feud. How about blowback against the maverick John McCain in his primary fight in Arizona? We in the limited government camp are not alone. The tea party movement itself rose to tell not only the federal government, but also the Republican Party, that to quote the movie Network, we are “as mad as hell and not going to take this anymore! Things have got to change!” Now we don’t merely want change for changes’ sake. We have seen the supposed hope and change that President Obama offers, and now our future is clouded and uncertain. We need a new and better direction. Neither citizens nor corporations should endlessly suckle at the teat of the government, merely crying for bread and circuses. That crooked road doesn’t lead to freedom and prosperity, but to shackles and serfdom. To reclaim our nation we need a path paved with the promises of liberty and personal responsibility, not welfare and bailouts.
This year, I believe no battle is more important in war for the heart and soul of the GOP than in Kentucky. For the side of the limited government crowd we have Rand Paul, son of Texas Representative and 2008 Presidential candidate Ron Paul. For the side of the establishment, we have Trey Grayson, the Secretary of State of Kentucky. With the primary less than two weeks away, politicians and political leaders from both wings of the Republican Party have taken notice and have come out swinging with endorsements. In Grayson’s column, we have Senate Minority Leader and Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, Dick Cheney, Rick Santorum, and Rudy Giuliani. Paul’s supporters include Senator Jim DeMint (SC), Steve Forbes, Dr. James Dobson, and Sarah Palin. These endorsements alone should give you some indication of the quality of the two men.
On many issues both candidates share the same (or nearly the same) views: abortion, taxes, and spending. Therefore, I don’t believe it would be fair to say that either candidate is not conservative. What makes Paul a better choice, in my mind, is his limited government mindset. I think Erick Erickson of Red State sums up my thoughts pretty well. “The problem with Republicans in Congress is that they lost their way. They were willing to do things they otherwise would oppose because George Bush told them to. And they have been willing ever since to go along with strategies that were poll tested and mother approved because that is what the leadership wanted and told them to do.” He goes on to add, “I want men and women of high moral character who are men and women of conservative principle, not of party.
When of party, politicians think too often of saving themselves, not the country. For too long the Republicans have invested in solid party guys who advance the party’s agenda, but not conservatism and certainly not smaller government.”
Amen Mr. Erickson. We need leaders who are not afraid to actually lead.
Like his father, Rand Paul is against bailouts of all kinds, the Federal Reserve, and even opposes the Patriot Act and the War in Iraq. Although such a line of thinking is not popular with the establishment Republicans and may even be considered radical, I believe that this path is the only method to save the Republican Party and, more importantly, our nation as a whole.
Although I do not live in Kentucky, I wholeheartedly endorse and support Rand Paul. Neither side will be able to claim ultimate victory as a result of this primary, but a win for Paul will likely create aftershocks felt across the land. Sooner or later in our own cities, counties, and states, both you and I will have the opportunity to choose between the status quo and a limited, constitutional government. On that day, will you have the courage to take a stand?