The Schmookler & Huffman Show (Episode LV)

This morning, Andy Schmookler and I had our monthly appearance on 550 AM WSVA.

In the past, we have been told that the subjects of guns and abortion are off limits for discussion.  Therefore, I was caught off guard when, before going on the air today, we were informed that we would be starting off the show talking about firearms and the 2nd Amendment due to the recent school shootings in Florida.

Although that issue took up most of the time in the show, we also spoke briefly about the situation in the Middle East including the corruption charges against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the potential for greater conflict in an almost constantly volatile region.  Last, was the issue of Mitt Romney’s run for the U.S. Senate representing the state of Utah and whether or not he would stand up to Donald Trump if Romney were elected.

As always, if you missed the show live, you can catch it here.

Spain, Netanyahu, & The Press

Image from Benjamin Netanyahu’s Twitter page

Yesterday, a judge in Spain issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.  Thus, if Mr. Netanyahu sets foot in Spain he could be subject to arrest and detention from Spanish authorities.  The outstanding warrant also includes: Foreign Minister Avigdor Leiberman, ex-Defense Minister Ehud Barak, former Interior Minister Eli Yishai, former Minister of Strategic Affairs Moshe Yaalon, Minister without Portfolio Benny Begin, and Vice-Admiral Maron Eliezer.

This situation stems from an incident in 2010 when several ships attempted to bring aid to the Gaza Strip and thus break an Israeli blockade.  Although there were no major incidents with the other ships, when the Israeli forces boarded the Mavi Marmara, nine people were killed in the ensuing struggle and a tenth died later.

However, one aspect of the story that I find particularly fascinating is how various news outlets are reporting it.  Right-wing sources, like Fox News and Breitbart, seem to paint the Israeli defense forces in a positive light while left-wing sources, such as The Huffington Post and the Independent, do the opposite.

For example, here is an excerpt from Fox:

In the 2010 incident, a group of human rights activists — which included members affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, according to authorities – boarded several aid ships to try and break an Israeli naval blockade of the Gaza Strip, the Jerusalem Post reports.

Israel’s navy was able to stop several of the ships without incident, but its commandos were attacked when boarding the Mavi Marmara, leaving 10 activists dead in an ensuing gun battle.

Note that it mentioned that some of the activists were affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood and that the Israeli forces were the ones being attacked.

Compare that to The Huffington Post:

The case was brought against the men after an attack by Israeli Defence Forces on the so-called ‘Freedom Flotilla’ ships, which were sailing to Gaza from Istanbul and Greece in support of Palestinian settlements.

The long-fought legal battle was focused on the ‘Mavi Marmara’ ship – the head civilian vessel among a fleet carrying humanitarian aid in an attempt to break the Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip.

Nine activists were killed in the incident in which the ship was stormed by IDF personnel.

In this version, the story goes that the ship was both civilian and humanitarian and was attacked by the Israeli Defense Forces.

In the first story, those breaking the blockade seem to be the bad guys; in the second, it is those enforcing the blockade.

But which is the truth?  Was the blockade legal or illegal?  Were the ships attempting to bring humanitarian aid or weapons to the people of Gaza?  Did the ships provoke the Israeli Defense Forces or was it the other way around?  Did the Israelis have the right to board these ships?  Did the ships have a right to defend themselves?

Unfortunately, your answer to all of these questions may hinge upon what news outlet you choose to read the story.  Presumably liberals would get the liberal version of the events while conservatives get the conservative one.  With these slanted and biased sources objectivism and truth can fall by the wayside depending on whether you wish to show the Israelis as doing everything they can to protect their people from the horrors of terrorism or a group of humanitarians bringing critical aid to a people under the heel of brutal oppression.

So again, what is the truth?  Are the Spanish authorities acting correctly in this matter or is it the Israeli leaders who are in the right?  How can we know?  Do we simply let Fox News and the Huffington Post decide for us?

The Schmookler & Huffman Show (Episode XX)

This morning, Andy Schmookler and I appeared on WSVA, 550 AM, for our twentieth time.  Today was a slightly different format; while I was in the studio in Harrisonburg, Andy called in from Shenandoah County.

The three major topics of the show were: the upcoming visit from Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, the current controversy concerning vaccinations, and the 24th district Senate race in Staunton, Waynesboro, Augusta County, Rockingham County, and elsewhere.  I feel as if we only began to scratch the surface of the senate race, but on-air time constraints cut the matter short.  Hopefully, we can revisit the topic in a future show.

Anyway, in case you missed it, you can find today’s show here.